Hey everyone.
I promised to complete a write-up about our findings in class, and here I am. Earlier, we found the relationship between the total energy (let's call this U for now) and the density of states D(E) :
U=∫topbottomD(E)f(E)EdEwheref(E)=11+exp[(E−μ)/kT]
For neatness' sake, I'll use Eb and Et to denote the bottom and the top of the band, respectively.
Q: How do we relate this to specific heat?
From CV=ΔUΔT (the specific heat at constant volume), we can write
CV=∂∂T∫EtEbD(E)f(E)EdE∫EtEbD(E)∂f(E)∂TEdE.Given that∂f(Eb)∂TD(Eb)≈0and∂f(Et)∂TD(Et)≈0rather strongly,
we can justify D(E)≈D(E0)=constant, the density of states at the ground energy. So,
CV≈D(E0)∫EtEb∂f(E)∂TEdE=D(E0)∫EtEbE−μkT2exp[(E−μ)/kT](1+exp[(E−μ)/kT])2EdE
where μ is something we didn't really get to discuss in depth... anyway,
CV≈D(E0)kT∫EtEb(E−μ)exp[(E−μ)/kT](1+exp[(E−μ)/kT])2EdEkT.
We can make this integration easier by letting our limits go to infinity instead. Physically, we're only including negligible contributions by doing this, so I'm pretty comfortable with that. Furthermore, substituting x=(E−μ)/kT and dx=dE/kT, we get
CV≈D(E0)(kT)2T∫∞−∞EkTxex(1+ex)2dx≈D(E0)k2T[∫∞−∞E−μkTxex(1+ex)2dx+∫∞−∞μkTxex(1+ex)2dx]≈D(E0)k2T[∫∞−∞x2ex(1+ex)2dx+μkT∫∞−∞xex(1+ex)2dx]≈D(E0)k2T∫∞−∞x2ex(1+ex)2dx
since the second integral indeed cancels out by asymmetry. We are left with an immediately repulsive integral, but closer inspection à la Wolfram reveals true beauty:
CV≈D(E0)k2Tπ23
As promised, this constant (π2/3) is a small contribution in the scheme of things, since D(E0), which is proportional to the number of atoms in the crystal, is such a large number by comparison.
Really, the take-away seems to be that heat capacity is linear with respect to temperature... at least to a first order approximation. At the same time, it's interesting to note that this approach implies that different values of μ and E don't affect the heat capacity whatsoever, though that could be a result inherent to either the rough handling of μ or the idealized 1-dimensional nature of the problem.
Have a great 3-day weekend everyone.
Wow. I was going to add this to the homework due Wednesday so you may have saved everyone a bunch of work. Does this seem correct? What do people think?
ReplyDeleteA few thoughts about Eo and μ: perhaps in the context of a crystal will can call Eo the center-of-the-band energy since it is not the energy of the lowest state anymore but has become a marker for the middle of the band. Also, what is the relationship between μ and Eo? What fixes the value of μ?