For this post I will attempt to write out expression for Eq in terms of even and odd ϕ0
Odd wave functions ϕ(x−mc)odd={−Deκ(x−mc),x<mc−a/2Asin(kx),mc−a/2<x<mc+a/2De−κ(x−mc),x>mc+a/2
Even wave functions ϕ(x−mc)even={Deκ(x−mc),x<mc−a/2Bcos(kx),mc−a/2<x<mc+a/2De−κ(x−mc)x>mc+a/2
Just like the First Homework we can construct a hamiltonian but this time
for periodic finite square wells. In this example I choose c to be the distance between two successive wells
for periodic finite square wells. In this example I choose c to be the distance between two successive wells
The depth is denoted by V=−1500eV
it is characterized by V0(x−mc)={0,x<mc−a/2V,mc−a/2<x<mc+a/20,x>mc+a/2
The hamiltonian is:
H=∑∞n=−∞V0(x−nc)+p2/2m=H0+∑n≠0V0(x−nc)
The test wave function is ψq=∑∞m=−∞eimqcϕ0(x−mc)
The S.E. doting with <ϕ0| can yield an expression for Eq:
<ϕ0(x)|Eq|ψq>=<ϕ0(x)|H|ψq>⇔
<ϕ0(x)|Eq|ψq>=<ϕ0(x)|H0+∑n≠0V0(x−cn)|ψq>⇔
Eq=E+<ϕ0(x)|∑n≠0V0(x−cn)|ψq><ϕ0(x)|ψq>
Now time to evaluate the denominator Iden=<ϕ0|ψq> :
Ignoring other terms because we are always dotting with ϕ0(x)
Iden=+...+<ϕ0|e−iqcϕ0(x+c)>+<ϕ0|ϕ0>+<ϕ0|eiqcϕ0(x−c)>+...
Iden≃1+2cos(qc)∫ϕ0(x)ϕ0(x+c)dx
this holds for both even and odd
Now to deal with the numerator Inum
In the next steps I assume c>a and by drawing the integrals I get that the following contribute to I
note that the properties of the potential make <ϕ0|V0(x−c)|ϕ0(x)>=0
and other terms zero respectively but the terms m=-1 n=-1 and m=1 n=1 yield
Inum≃2cos(qc)<ϕ0|V0(x−c)|ϕ0(x−c)>
I will very soon post the final expressions for Ideno,Inum but I wrote one that llustrates the form that I got for odd ϕ0
Ideno−12cos(qc)=∫−a/2−∞D2ekc∗e2kxdx−∫a/2−a/2ADsin(kx)ekxdx−∫−a/2+ca/2D2∗e−kcdx+
∫a/2+c−a/2+cADsin(k(x−c))∗e−kxdx+∫∞a/2+cD2e−2kxekcdx
for the above, I tried calculating it but seemed too hard so maybe its ok to leave it equal 1 ?
For Inum , keeping in mind that the range of the integral is dictated by the range of non-zero potential
For odd Inum=2cos(qc)∗∫c+a/2c−a/2De−k(x−c)∗V∗Asin(k(x−c))dx⇔
Inum=−2V∗D∗Acos(qc)∗ekc((1/2+i/2)e−ck(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)−sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))∗1/k⇔
Inum=−2V∗D∗Acos(qc)((1/2+i/2)(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)−sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))∗1/k
Inum=−2V∗D∗Acos(qc)((1/2+i/2)(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)−sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))∗1/k
For even Inum=2cos(qc)∗∫c+a/2c−a/2De−k(x−c)∗V∗Bcos(k(x−c))dx⇔
Inum=2V∗B∗Dcos(qc)∗ekc((1/2−i/2)e−ck(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)+sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))∗1/k⇔
Inum=2V∗B∗Dcos(qc)((1/2−i/2)(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)+sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))∗1/k
Inum=2V∗B∗Dcos(qc)((1/2−i/2)(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)+sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))∗1/k
Reflections:
The c dependence for the numerator has disappeared!
Does the significance of the width come in on the denominator ?
Did I leave out significant integral contributions in the denominatior?
Is the assumption c>a ok ?
I welcome questions and remarks!
This is good. I think, in a way, what it shows is that to make progress we may need definite wave-functions with actual numerical values for A and D (or B and D) as well as a specific numerical value for the well separation.
ReplyDeleteChoosing the well separation thoughtfully could save as a lot of time.
please see also my comments to Nellie's post.
DeleteAlso, we are using a for lattice spacing, so it might be best to use something else for well width.
ReplyDelete