Processing math: 100%

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Calculating energy as a function of lattice spacing

For this post I will attempt to write out expression for Eq in terms of even and odd ϕ0
Odd wave functions ϕ(xmc)odd={Deκ(xmc),x<mca/2Asin(kx),mca/2<x<mc+a/2Deκ(xmc),x>mc+a/2

Even wave functions ϕ(xmc)even={Deκ(xmc),x<mca/2Bcos(kx),mca/2<x<mc+a/2Deκ(xmc)x>mc+a/2

Just like the First Homework we can construct a hamiltonian but this time


for periodic finite square wells. In this example I choose c to be the distance between two successive wells

The depth is denoted by V=1500eV
it is characterized by V0(xmc)={0,x<mca/2V,mca/2<x<mc+a/20,x>mc+a/2

The hamiltonian is:
H=n=V0(xnc)+p2/2m=H0+n0V0(xnc)

The test wave function is ψq=m=eimqcϕ0(xmc)

The S.E. doting with <ϕ0| can yield an expression for Eq:
<ϕ0(x)|Eq|ψq>=<ϕ0(x)|H|ψq>⇔ 
<ϕ0(x)|Eq|ψq>=<ϕ0(x)|H0+n0V0(xcn)|ψq>⇔   
Eq=E+<ϕ0(x)|n0V0(xcn)|ψq><ϕ0(x)|ψq>
Now time to evaluate the denominator Iden=<ϕ0|ψq> :

Ignoring other terms because we are always dotting with ϕ0(x)
  Iden=+...+<ϕ0|eiqcϕ0(x+c)>+<ϕ0|ϕ0>+<ϕ0|eiqcϕ0(xc)>+...
Iden1+2cos(qc)ϕ0(x)ϕ0(x+c)dx 

this holds for both even and odd 

Now to deal with the numerator Inum

In the next steps I assume c>a and by drawing the integrals I get that the following contribute to I

note that the properties of the potential make <ϕ0|V0(xc)|ϕ0(x)>=0
and other terms zero respectively but the terms m=-1 n=-1 and m=1 n=1 yield
Inum2cos(qc)<ϕ0|V0(xc)|ϕ0(xc)>

I will very soon post the final expressions for Ideno,Inum but I wrote one that llustrates the form that I got for odd ϕ0  

Ideno12cos(qc)=a/2D2ekce2kxdxa/2a/2ADsin(kx)ekxdxa/2+ca/2D2ekcdx+
a/2+ca/2+cADsin(k(xc))ekxdx+a/2+cD2e2kxekcdx

for the above, I tried calculating it but seemed too hard so maybe its ok to leave it equal 1 ?

For Inum , keeping in mind that the range of the integral is dictated by the range of non-zero potential

For odd Inum=2cos(qc)c+a/2ca/2Dek(xc)VAsin(k(xc))dx
Inum=2VDAcos(qc)ekc((1/2+i/2)eck(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))1/k
Inum=2VDAcos(qc)((1/2+i/2)(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))1/k


For even Inum=2cos(qc)c+a/2ca/2Dek(xc)VBcos(k(xc))dx
Inum=2VBDcos(qc)ekc((1/2i/2)eck(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)+sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))1/k
Inum=2VBDcos(qc)((1/2i/2)(sin((1/2+i/2)ak)+sinh((1/2+i/2)ak)))1/k


Reflections: 

The c dependence for the numerator has disappeared!
Does the significance of the width come in on the denominator ?
 Did I leave out significant integral contributions in the denominatior?
Is the assumption c>a ok ?
I welcome questions and remarks!

3 comments:

  1. This is good. I think, in a way, what it shows is that to make progress we may need definite wave-functions with actual numerical values for A and D (or B and D) as well as a specific numerical value for the well separation.

    Choosing the well separation thoughtfully could save as a lot of time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also, we are using a for lattice spacing, so it might be best to use something else for well width.

    ReplyDelete